This has actually been going around the interwebs for a while. But, the more I see it, the more I am inclined to agree with it:
Like most folks in this country, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem). What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don’t have to pass a urine test.
So, here is my Question: Shouldn’t one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their a– doing drugs, while I work. . . Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?
I am also not opposed to helping people out, but the first author of that email has a point. If I am subject to random drug testing to keep my job, why shouldn’t the recipients of public money also be required to pass a random drug test to stay on the program?
More from MuskogeeUSA
- Thunderbird Speedway to re-open
- Beware the Farkle™
- Solar power – Can you really sell unused power back to the utility?
- Could we be seeing a decline in apathy?
- Thank God every day
MuskogeeUSA Recommends
- ‘TWILIGHT’ TATTOOS: ART OR AWFUL? (Open Book Society)
- 10 THINGS MOVIE THEATERS WON’T TELL YOU (Open Book Society)
- OBS SPEAKS OUT: MAD AT SUMMIT AGAIN!!!! (Open Book Society)
- OBS SPEAKS OUT: TRUE BLOOD BITES BACK (Open Book Society)
- OBS SPEAKS OUT: CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING AND “CHRISTIAN” PUBLISHING | Open Society Book Club Discussions and Reviews (Open Book Society)




Twitter
RSS